Contact Us

    Please use the contact form to send us an email - and receive a response within 12 hours.

    Emergency? Call 720-220-2277 (24/7)







    Map To Our Office
    Read Out Blog
    Case Evaluation
    Charged With A Crime?

    Colorado Criminal Law – Parties to a Phone Call – Phone Calls Made From a Jail or Prison*

           *By Colorado Criminal Defense Lawyer – H. Michael Steinberg

    The Law in Colorado On Evidence of Intercepted Phone Calls

    A party to an intercepted telephone call may move to suppress statements contained in the call if the call was unlawfully intercepted. § 16-15-102(10).

    Where one party consents to interception of a telephone call, the call is not “unlawfully” intercepted, and statements contained in the call should not be suppressed.

    Colorado Law – 18-9-303(1)(a), C.R.S. 2010 – a person commits unlawful wiretapping if the person knowingly records a telephone communication without consent of at least one party to the call.

    When and How This Arises During a Colorado Criminal Case

    At a hearing on a defendant’s motion to suppress (to attempt to exclude evidence of a phone call he made from the jail), correctional officers typically will testify that a recording, which is played to inmates on the telephone handset before every telephone call placed by a prisoner using that telephone instructs the inmate that the call would be recorded.

    Typically at the jail orientation, prisoners – before they are allowed to make phone calls – must agree to read and abide by jail house rules which state that outgoing telephone calls would be recorded. In addition most jails have signs posted on the wall by the phones that specifically state that all phone calls are recorded and may later be used against the inmate.

    A prison inmate is therefore required to permit monitoring of telephone calls as a condition of using prison telephones, … the prisoner impliedly consents if he has notice of monitoring and still places calls on the prison telephones. United States v. Hammond, 286 F.3d 189, 193 (4th Cir. 2002).

    Voluntariness of Consent

    The argument that an inmate does not consent because he/she has no choice but to use the telephones at the jail to make the call …. while the choice may not be an easy one, the law does not permit this circumstances to render the defendant’s consent to the rules involuntary.

     


    Other Articles of Interest:

    If you found the information provided on this webpage to be helpful, please click my Plus+1 button so that others may also find it.

    ___________________________
    H. Michael Steinberg Esq.
    Attorney and Counselor at Law
    The Colorado Criminal Defense Law Firm of H. Michael Steinberg
    A Denver, Colorado Lawyer Focused Exclusively On
    Colorado Criminal Law For Over 40 Years.
    The Edward Building
    8400 East Prentice Ave, Penthouse 1500
    Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111
    E-Mail:  [email protected]
    Primary Web Site:  http://www.HMichaelSteinberg.com
    Colorado Criminal Law Blog:  www.Colorado-Criminal-Lawyer-Online.com
    Main:  303.627.7777
    Cell:  720.220.2277
    24/7 Pager:  303.543.4433
    FAX (Toll Free):  1.877.533.6276
    Always investigate a lawyer's qualifications and experience before making a
    decision to retain that lawyer or, for that matter, any professional ...in any field.